ScrollFans

I'd be interested in physical copies as promo cards. Besides, even if Promo cards came out in-game now, they would have to be reworked after the Beta release.

I would like those Death Cap Berserks. I have some Growth cards - including two God Hands - and some other cards I'd be willing to trade.

Quote from carvine1 »

It doesn't seem like a advantage or disadvantage issue. It seems more like a bug issue. Both players should start with the same number of scrolls shouldn't they?

No, it is actually programmed for players to start with different number of cards. Whoever goes first doesn't draw, is the rule in Magic:the Gathering. The disparity in the starting hand represents this same concept.

I honestly don't think this concept works in a balanced manner for Scrolls, but its just another thing that needs adjusting. It would be much more bearable if a player could choose whether they wanted to go first or not. Like, if they won a coin flip against the opponent, they get to choose.

Quote from liberty_caps »

Quote from Adrameleck »

I can't agree with ALL THREE of those cards being banned.

EDIT: And I don't even like Growth.

I am going to assume you don't want to play in the tournament then.

Yes, I'm dropping out then.

I can't agree with ALL THREE of those cards being banned.

EDIT: And I don't even like Growth.

My in-game name is Adrameleck :) I'm willing to agree to everything set out.

Well, I suppose in quick matches, I'm sure spectating real-time wouldn't be a big deal, but personally, I would want a delay if someone were to spectate a ranked match.

omg I love Blue/Red. That's the last deck I played ._.

I'm interested. And I agree, making a gold pool would be easier. It would also make it easier to give something to runner-ups as well. With a card pool of rare cards, it would be like loot in WoW - "I want that! No I want that!"

I like the idea. And I also like the idea of not being able to see the players' hands. whenever I watch my friends play card games, I try to avoid looking at their hands - it would be similar to that experience.

A delay would still be necessary though. Otherwise, a spectator could be a friend, and they could be working together - two people trying to figure out your plans is a terrible idea.

Quote from XENOpz »

Yes. Having four cards is ridiculous. I would rather have five and my opponent 6.

I agree with the above. The way it is, you just get too few cards to make use of the resource advantage. Completely opinionated, though. I also agree with the ability to have a choice, though I don't blame them for not including it in Alpha.

I believe there was also a bug associated with hand size at the start of the game...