I would certainly play this. I'll have a bit more interest in playing to build up my deck, although luckily I already have a decent Energy deck.
IGN: DraconixMechanum
I would certainly play this. I'll have a bit more interest in playing to build up my deck, although luckily I already have a decent Energy deck.
IGN: DraconixMechanum
Math for scrolls doesn't really work in this case because of the multitude of decks. Growth has a very quick start, whereas Energy moves much slower, for instance, and even within resources there is a myraid of possibilities.
65
Quote from redderickjohns »
Quote from Niarreborn »
Quote from redderickjohns »
Quote from Niarreborn »
That Graveyard-System should indeed be more transparent. There could be the possibility that for example sacrificed cards go straight into the remaining deck and not into the graveyard.
I think that the graveyard system should then be less transparent. If it were to be more transparent then you would see even less of it. :)
;) Nah, in this case "transparent" is a literary figure: "Make things more clear".
Ah! I see through what you mean.
I see through what you did there . . .
52
No big deal. The Internets can be rather ambiguous sometimes :)
39
34
Quote from ChrisVolkoff »
Quote from DrakonMechanum »
Dude, they already have three bots (although they are probably just variations on the same thing). They are called RobotEasy, RobotMedium, and RobotHard.
Yeah, but he's talking about using them to replace the opponent.
Yes, I know. I was talking to riggsE, who said in the post above mine that it would take time and money to develop bots. It would but I was saying they already have, so JayJay's idea is sound. I am sorry for the misunderstanding, perhaps I sould have quoted riggsE to make it clearer.
Dude, they already have three bots (although they are probably just variations on the same thing). They are called RobotEasy, RobotMedium, and RobotHard.